马来西亚网卖假名牌会犯法吗？《2019年商标法令》第102是什么？

马来西亚网卖假名牌会犯法吗？以假货充真货，高仿品，名牌赝制品当原装货来卖，在马来西亚的法律来说，翻版的就是犯法。最新的《2019年商标法令》更引入各种新的刑事罪。

网卖假名牌衣 男子与越南妻月赚8万

2021年1月，嫌犯夫妇以快递方式，从越南引进大量各名牌的T恤赝品，再通过其已有3万追踪人数的面子书专页，以不到20令吉的价格公然售出，每月可赚5万至8万令吉。

他指出，当局在有关单位起获至少3000件逾6万令吉，各品牌的仿制T恤，其中包括阿迪达斯（Adidas）、耐吉（Nike）和香奈儿（ Chanel）等等。

当局将援引2019年商标法令第102（1）（c）条文调查此案，而这也已是2021年开年以来，第3宗被查获的案件。

贸易部起获超过价值RM30万冒牌衣服！

2020年1月，网络上看到有一家商店因为卖冒牌货而被警察逮捕，并可罚款不超过RM1千万或者坐牢不超过3年。不知道网民们有没有中招呢？这次被冒牌贩卖的牌子就是 Versace 。

Versace经营的品种丰富，如：男女成衣、高级箱包、鞋履、皮带、眼镜、香水、腕表、丝巾和一些精致的家具用品。由于牌子具有特色也深受那么多人喜爱，于是在某家购物广场卖起了翻版货，价钱可以说是跟original的一样。

执法员当场充公所有物品，总值为30万3576令吉，并以《2019年商标法令》第102(1)(c)条文当场开出传票，并可与同条法令第102(1)(ii)条文同读。

《2019年商标法令》第102(1)(c)条文

马来西亚《2019年商标法案》TRADEMARKS ACT 2019 针对《1976年商标法》进行了全面性的修改和修订，将为马来西亚商标法带来一个全新的面貌。

其中引入各种新的刑事罪(例如假冒商标、将注册商标虚假应用于商品或服务、进口或销售具有虚假商标的商品、向商标局或登记册提供虚假条目)开庭法院将有权审判此类罪行。

Website: http://www.myipo.gov.my/
Click here to view: Full PDF copy of TRADEMARKS ACT 2019

Importing or selling, etc., goods with falsely applied trademark

No. 102
(1) Any person who—
(a) imports into Malaysia for the purpose of trade or manufacture;
(b) sells or offers or exposes for sale; or
(c) has in his possession, custody or control for the purpose of trade or manufacture,

any goods to which a registered trademark is falsely applied under section 100, unless he proves that having taken all reasonable precautions against committing an offence under this section, he had, at the time of the commission of the alleged offence, no reason to suspect the genuineness of the trademark and on demand made by the Assistant Controller as defined in section 109, he gave all the information in his knowledge with respect to the persons from whom he obtained the goods, commits an offence and shall, on conviction, be liable—

(i) if the person is a body corporate, to a fine not exceeding fifteen thousand ringgit for each of the goods with the falsely applied registered trademark, and for a second or subsequent offence, to a fine not exceeding thirty thousand ringgit for each of the goods with the falsely applied registered trademark; or

(ii) if the person is not a body corporate, to a fine not exceeding ten thousand ringgit for each of the goods with the falsely applied registered trademark or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or
to both, and for a second or subsequent offence, to a fine not exceeding twenty thousand ringgit for each of the goods with the falsely applied registered trademark, or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or to both.

(2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(c), a person having in his possession three or more of the goods to which a registered trademark is falsely applied is deemed to have in possession the goods for the purpose of trade or manufacture.