马来时评家:【红衫军进退两难,已成国际大笑柄】
Posted on Saturday, September 12th, 2015 and under 大马时事.Warning: Undefined variable $before in /home3/myrunners/public_html/itudia.com/share/wp-content/themes/sim/single.php on line 19
Warning: Undefined variable $sep in /home3/myrunners/public_html/itudia.com/share/wp-content/themes/sim/single.php on line 19
Warning: Undefined variable $after in /home3/myrunners/public_html/itudia.com/share/wp-content/themes/sim/single.php on line 19
Tags: 916嘉玛
文:张丹枫
我们谈论916马来人支持巫统领袖贪污大集会的课题已经
著名马来时评家沙布丁认为,916红衫军根本没有什么目
正因如此,现在红衫军已经陷入进退两难的境地。他们之前
1969年五一三时期的马来人,可以随便就被煽动而拿着
1987年茅草行动前夕的马来人也很容易被纳吉等人煽动
但是踏入21世纪之后的马来人,却已经不再容易掉入巫统
为什么说召集者现在陷入进退两难的境地呢?因为Bers
在大多数马来人心目中,如果红衫军上街人数少过50万人
然而从一开始他们就走错棋,那些暴力的宣言和【捍卫马来
马来社会如今已经认定,纳吉不但令马来族群蒙羞和尊严尽
沙布丁说,红衫军召集人越是闪闪缩缩,越令马来人反感。
沙布丁说:每个开明的马来人都知道,Bersih的诉求
这两天,大家看到红衫军的策略变来变去,从最初的【让华
前法律部长再益伊布拉欣公开批评红衫军是在羞辱着自己的
再益和其他巫统元老毫不留情的批判,大大增加了红衫军的
Shahbudin: Reds upset yellows rejected Najib
Joe Fernandez
If less than 500,000 Malays turn up for the rally of the Red Shirts on Malaysia Day, it means the community too has rejected Najib.
KUALA LUMPUR: It’s clear, said a political analyst, that the so-called Himpunan Maruah Melayu, which plans to take to the streets in Kuala Lumpur in red shirts on Malaysia Day, September 16 or 916, in an anti-Chinese rally, is a show of support for embattled Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak. “It’s a rejection of Bersih 4, in the words of the Red Shirts, a rejection of the ‘Chinese’ demand that Najib step down.”
“If less than 500,000 Malays turn up for the rally being organised by the Red Shirts, it means that the community too has rejected Najib just like the people did during Bersih 4.”
Although the gathering has also been variously described as Himpunan Melayu Bersatu and Himpunan Rakyat Bersatu, the only theme behind the gathering that makes any sense is that it was designed by its organisers, faceless creatures, to support and defend Najib as Prime Minister, said Shahbudin Husin. “They should ask Najib for some of the RM2.6 billion donation that he collected.”
“The police have rejected the Red Shirts but Najib and his deputy, Home Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, have virtually endorsed them after earlier condemning Bersih 4 as illegal, banning their yellow T-shirts and material, and now hauling the organisers to Court.”
It would be more honest, said Shahbudin, if those taking to the streets in red shirts on 916 in Kuala Lumpur carry banners and placards with the words, “Support Najib getting RM2.6 billion”, “RM2.6 billion proof that Najib is a performer” and other rally material with similar meanings.
He reiterated that the Red Shirts spilling into the streets were nothing more than a reaction to Bersih 4 on the eve of Merdeka Day in the peninsula. “The main theme of Bersih 4 was to demand that Najib step down.”
“So, the Red Shirts are reacting to that demand. Bersih 4 was not about the Chinese. It has nothing to do with the Chinese or any community. Everyone, not just Chinese, took part in Bersih 4 in Kuala Lumpur, Kota Kinabalu, Kuching and 70 nations worldwide.”
It’s logical to assume, said the analyst, that since the yellow shirts of Bersih 4 was a rejection of Najib, the Red Shirts in rejecting the demand of the yellow shirts, wants to support and defend Najib although he has shamed the Malays, Umno and the nation.
It’s a fallacy on the part of the Red Shirts to suddenly link, out of the blue, the Malays, their dignity, and their position with the objectives of the 916 rally in Kuala Lumpur. “The Malays have not been threatened or shaken in any manner. The Malays are still Malays, they are where they are, and they have not gone anywhere and are not going anywhere.”
“The rich are still rich, the paupers are still paupers, forgotten by all.
Nothing has changed.”
The Malays, pointed out Shahbudin, are still freely mixing with everyone without fear or favour, working with others as well, doing business with others as well. “Those working with the Chinese are still working with the Chinese. There’s no change in their situation to force the Red Shirts to take to the streets on their behalf.”
The Malays leaders who like to pretend that the community was under threat, are still hanging around the hotels as usual, and chomping on their expensive cigars. “They have not suddenly reduced their activities – sharing the “benefits” with their Chinese partners — to suddenly defend the bangsa, agama, negara. They don’t show any signs that the dignity of the Malays has been challenged and that the community was suddenly, out of the blue, under threat.”
“Why would the Malays be under threat for no rhyme or reason? Why would their dignity be suddenly challenged for no rhyme or reason? The Malays have the same opportunities as before. Nothing has been taken away from them by anyone.”